They said "complete transparency"
They said "all names will be released"
They said "the public deserves the truth"
75% of Americans want full transparency on the Epstein files.
Last updated: September 26, 2025
The Epstein Files contain more than 300 gigabytes of classified evidence collected during the criminal investigations of financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sex trafficking. These files include contact lists, flight manifests, and personal diaries.
Their existence has fueled global speculation—particularly about a so-called “Epstein client list” allegedly used to blackmail powerful figures.
Public and political pressure for transparency has intensified. While Donald Trump once vowed to release the documents during his 2024 campaign, the case has since turned into a deeply polarized political battle, with Trump calling the story a “Democrat Hoax.”
Although the term “Epstein client list” remains unofficial, several prominent names have appeared in released materials — from flight logs to court exhibits.
Documents from the House Oversight Committee mention several elite figures:
New files released in September 2025 also mention financier Peter Thiel alongside Musk and Bannon.
Epstein’s estate turned over to Congress a 2003 guestbook known as the “Birthday Book.”
The handling of the Epstein Files under the Trump administration in 2025 sparked bipartisan criticism and claims of political manipulation.
In February 2025, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters that the “client list” was “on her desk for review,” under President Trump’s orders.
But by July 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and FBI issued a memo concluding:
These findings were met with skepticism. Trump—who once promised full transparency—later dismissed the files as fake, urging his supporters to ignore the “Epstein Hoax.”
Some officials accused the DOJ of protecting Trump. Senator Dick Durbin claimed FBI agents were instructed to “flag” any files mentioning Trump. The FBI allegedly redacted his name from early records, arguing he was a private citizen in 2006 when the first Epstein probe began.
Democrats in Congress, citing a “White House cover-up,” pushed for a full release of the files. House Speaker Mike Johnson delayed a vote, reportedly giving the Trump administration “room to act.”
Public support for transparency remains overwhelming:
The Trump administration’s management of the case has raised serious ethical questions.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche—who also serves as Trump’s personal lawyer—met with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted accomplice, in July 2025. Maxwell was granted limited immunity and used the interview to praise Trump, claiming she had “never seen him in any improper setting.”
Shortly after, Maxwell was transferred to a minimum-security prison, an unusual move for a convicted sex trafficker. According to a leaked (and denied) DOJ recording, the transfer “violated policy” and was meant “to keep her quiet.”
The DOJ attempted to unseal grand jury transcripts from the Epstein and Maxwell cases, claiming it would provide “new insights.” A federal judge denied the motion, accusing the DOJ of offering “publicly dishonest explanations.”
The Epstein Files controversy endures because official conclusions—no client list, confirmed suicide—contradict deep public mistrust.
Epstein’s victims and families continue to demand the full release of all documents. Some survivors are compiling their own internal list of associates to publish publicly, citing frustration with government secrecy.
For many Americans, the Epstein case represents more than a political scandal. It’s a moral test—whether the rich and powerful can traffic children and still evade justice.
INSIDE DC PULSE
Tracking accountability in Washington
🔒 Secure donations processed by Stripe
Privacy Policy:
Donations:
Disclaimer: